Smart Meters:  Currently used for multiple purposes and all to many are for the wrong PURPOSES

THERE IS NO FEDERAL SECURITY MANDATE FOR SMART METERS, according to George W. Arnold the national coordinator for smart-grid interoperability at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. This agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce is said not to be involved in regulations but is only tasked with promoting standards among industries.
https://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/meter-d3.jpg
While both the 2005 and 2007 faux energy bills were codified into public laws, NO part of them creates a federal law pertaining to individual consumers or dictating that the public must be forced to comply with provisions of SMART Grid. 
Contrary to the bleating of manufacturers and utility talking heads, who claim there is no “opt out”, the fact is you, the consumer must be offered the meter, or request a meter and “OPT IN”. No one can be forced to comply with an unrevealed contract between private corporations, and to which you were never a party and had no knowledge of.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 :

Section 11135, CA Government Code Section 12926, Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. Sec. 794d), and regulations implementing that act as set forth in Part 1194 of Title 36 of the Federal Code of Regulations, and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112, 87 Stat. 394 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended, from being charged extra fees and costs to opt-out from wireless smart meters.

http://beforeitsnews.com/health/2017/06/ekg-proof-that-smart-meters-affect-the-human-heart-part-2-2754659.html

http://stopsmartmeters.org/

http://smartmeterdangers.org/smart-meter-research/

Originally, Sage Associates modeled the ITRON SKAMI-4 meter, which showed FCC violations were possible within 6 inches of the meter. The latest study radiofrequency radiation emissions for a PG&E smart meter (Silver Springs OWS-NIC514) will be 4.87 times stronger than the ITRON meter. This latest computer modeling report indicates that policy makers should ask for full information on all types of smart meters being deployed across California, since there be may be substantial differences in potential health risks and impacts to private property. 
“The emissions from one meter are strong enough that the public is put at risk from exposures outward from the meter from approximately one foot to over six feet, depending on the reflection factor,”says Cindy Sage, Sage Associates. “For multiple meters at the same location, the zone of impact where FCC limits may be violated is somewhere between three feet and 19 feet, depending on the reflection factor.” 

“PG&E is misleading the public with false assurances of safety. Smart Meter radiation will be a permanent part of the home, and people have no idea how high their chronic RF exposure might be. In reality, each Smart Meter functions like a cell antenna, relaying signals from other meters, and adds significantly to the existing radiation exposure already in the environment”, according to Barry A. Smith of the Environmental Health Coalition of West Marin.
In all meters studied to date, Sage Associates reported “excessively elevated radiofrequency/microwave radiation levels are likely to occur within occupied space of single family homes and multi-family dwellings. Scientific studies report risks for cancer, neurological diseases and cardiac problems at levels at and below those produced by smart meters. California’s leaders should be concerned that the smart meter wireless rollout may cost dearly in terms of health risks and high economic costs to consumers, with very little energy savings to show for it”.
Contact: Barry A. Smith Co-Director Environmental Health Coalition of West Marin
(415) 663-8025 bsmith@environmentalhealthcoalition.org
⦁ http://smartmeterdangers.org/multimedia-events-resources/
News
Return to Content 
Smart Meter Research
Mechanism for RF Bioeffects Explained, W/ Proposals for Blocking Effects 
Reported BioEffects of Microwave and RF Radiation (US Navy 1971) 
BioInitiative 2012 Report Issues New Warnings on Wireless and EMF 
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Biological Effects of Dirty Electricity (Havas) 
A Unified Theory of Weak Magnetic Field Action 
EMF Research Studies: A sorted list showing possible adverse effects 
Physiological Explanation for Electrosensitivity 

Exploring the public health impact of electromagnetic radiation (Genuis, 2008) 
Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation (Levit, Lai) 
Non-Thermal Effects and Mechanisms of Interaction Between Electromagnetic Fields and Living Matter 
Disturbance of Immune System by EM Fields (Dr. Olle Johansson, 2009) 
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: evidence for a novel neurological syndrome. 
EMF and RF World Concerns Summary

Electromagnetic intolerance elucidated (French research & new test) 
NEUROLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION 
BEES, BIRDS AND MANKIND: Destroying nature by “electrosmog” 
Electro-Sensitivity: the Research 

Reported Biological Effects From Radiofrequency Non-Ionizing Radiation 
Effect of electromagnetic fields on heart rate 

Electromagnetic fields alter regional cerebral blood flow and sleep and waking EEG 
Epidemiological evidence for a health risk from mobile phone base stations 
Biological responses of mobile phone frequency 

WHO: Failure to Apply Precautionary Principle 
Electrosmog effects on common frog tadpoles 

Honeybee behavior & bio under electrosmog caused by electromagnetic radiations 
Electromagnetic Fields: the Science on Human Health Effects – Video 
Behavioral and Cognitive Effects of Microwave Exposure 
NEUROLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION 
Research Studies: Electrical Sensitivity 

JAMA: Effects of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Signal Exposure on Brain Glucose Metabolism 
5 New Russian Studies Non-Ionizing Radiation 3.30.11 
Database of EMF/RF measurement studies 
Pulse modulated 900 MHz radiation induces hypothyroidism and apoptosis in thyroid cells 
Pulse Microwave Effects on Nerve Vitality 
The Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields – Commonwealth Club of California 2010 
Autoimmune Process after Long-Term Low-Level Exposure to Electromagnetic Field 
5,000 Microwave Studies 
Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation 
Index of Publications on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (0-1 00 GHz) 
Smart Meters Worse Than Cell Phones – Two Orders of Magnitude (Hirsch)

http://smartmeterdangers.org/smart-meter-scientific-research/smart-meter-research/

http://smartmeterdangers.org/smart-meter-scientific-research/seletun-scientific-statement-article/

http://smartmeterdangers.org/smart-meter-scientific-research/scientific-reports/

https://www.ada.gov/t2cmpfrm.htm

Updated: CA & Federal Laws Supporting No Opt-out Fees and Complaint Info
http://www.electrosmogprevention.org/smart-meter-resources-links/ca-state-utility-codes-support-no-opt-out-fees/
****Section 11135, CA Government Code Section 12926, Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. Sec. 794d), and regulations implementing that act as set forth in Part 1194 of Title 36 of the Federal Code of Regulations, and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112, 87 Stat. 394 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended, from being charged extra fees and costs to opt-out from wireless smart meters.
****
https://ppjg.me/2011/08/15/smart-meters-no-federal-mandate/
SMART METERS: No Federal Mandate 
August 15, 2011 
ppjg SMART METERS health hazards, Marti Oakley, No "opt in", PPJG, public utilities, PURPA, RF radiation, smart meters, surveillance, tax packages 46 Comments 
https://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/ppjg-4816.jpghttps://ppjg.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/ppjg-4816.jpg
Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2011 All Rights Reserved
Follow @MartiOakley
__________________________________________
This Standard would also allow utilities to recover from ratepayers any capital, operating expenditures, or other costs of the smart grid investment, including a reasonable rate-of-return. “
__________________________________________
_________________
USC Title 15 Commerce and Trade. 
Not revised, codified and enacted into positive law. http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/wysiwyg/544/usc-pos-law-titles.pdf 
Regardless, Title 15 Commerce and Trade is non-positive Code & Title, simply meaning that there is no underlying Constitutional authority for the federal government to enter into these areas and therefore, these “codes” cannot be codified into public law and carry no force of law except as it applies to theDistrict of Columbia, insular possessions and territories. These are the ONLY places the federal government has absolute authority. 
Commerce and trade cannot be codified into public law as there is no underlying Constitutional authority for the federal government to enter into commerce or trade other than as a contracting party or, in the treaty process. The government may enter into trade disputes between the states as an arbitrator when there is a state-to-state dispute although, depending upon the political leanings of SCOTUS at any given time, the twisting and contorting of this provision can change dramatically. 
The federal government has no authority to unlawfully cede to or, empower any federal agency with powers and authority the federal government does not possess and never did. 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 
http://www.ferc.gov/legal/fed-sta/ene-pol-act.asp http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/smart-grid.asphttp://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/smart-grid/eisa.pdf Federal metering requirements (Applies ONLY to federal buildings and [federal] housing) and include NO specific guidance of what to measure (i.e., kW, KVA, PF, Voltage, etc.)
PURPA Section 532 
http://www.seiec.com/Purpa%20II%20integrated%20resource%20planning.html
Estimated Budget Effects Of The Revenue Provisions Contained In Titles I. And XV. Of H.R. 6, The “Clean Renewable Energy And Conservation Tax Act Of 2007,” As Passed By The House Of Representatives On December 6, 2007 http://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=1352
Tax provisions written into both the 2005 and 2007 bills. http://jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=1353
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/press092808.shtml
Department of Energy funding from Stimulus package http://www.kema.com/services/consulting/utility-future/smart-grid/follow-the-money-stimulus-funding-begins-to-flow-into-smart-grid-section.aspx
Federal funding for metering federal buildings and federal housing http://www.govenergy.com/2009/pdfs/presentations/Energy101-Session05/Energy101-Session05-Chvala_William.pdf
An Energy Tax Package http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/press092808.shtml
Federal Meeting Requirements http://www.govenergy.com/2009/pdfs/presentations/Energy101-Session05/Energy101-Session05-Chvala_William.pdf 
Demand Response and SMART METERING Policy Actions since the Energy Policy Act of 2005. A summary for State Officials http://www.scribd.com/doc/43043654/US-Smart-Meters-Regulations-Policy-Makers-Guide 
What are “advanced meters?http://www.govenergy.com/2009/pdfs/presentations/Energy101-Session05/Energy101-Session05-Chvala_William.pdf
National Institutes of Standards and Technology http://www.nist.gov/smartgrid/
US-S Smart Meters Regulations Policy Makers Guide http://www.scribd.com/doc/43043654/US-Smart-Meters-Regulations-Policy-Makers-Guide
Program Details
Episode S6E26
Broadcast Week Jun 4th 2017
Duration 00:58:29
Audience Rating TV-G
Genre Newsmagazine
Theme Community Issues & Advocacy
Language English
  On Archive.org

Back to top